This document explains security model design for OpenACS 4. The security system with the OpenACS core must authenticate users in both secure and insecure environments. In addition, this subsystem provides sessions on top of the stateless HTTP protocol. This system also provides session level properties as a generic service to the rest of the OpenACS.
The atoms used in the implementation:
Cookies provide client side state. They are used to identify the user. Expiration of cookies is used to demark the end of a session.
This secure hash algorithm enables us to digitally sign cookies which guarantee that they have not been tampered with. It is also used to hash passwords.
SSL with server authentication: SSL v3
SSL provides the client with a guarantee that the server is actually the server it is advertised as being. It also provides a secure transport.
A session is defined as a series of clicks in which no two clicks are separated by more than some constant. This constant is the parameter SessionTimeout. Using the expiration time on the signatures of the signed cookies, we can verify when the cookie was issued and determine if two requests are part of the same session. It is important to note that the expiration time set in the cookie protocol is not trusted. Only the time inserted by the signed cookie mechanism is trusted.
Two levels of access can be granted: insecure and secure. This grant lasts for the remainder of the particular session. Secure authentication tokens are only issued over secured connections.
One consequence of this security design is that secure tokens are not automatically issued to users who authenticate themselves over insecure connections. This means that users will need to reauthenticate themselves over SSL when performing some action that requires secure authentication.
Although this makes the site less user friendly, this design significantly increases the security of the system because this insures that the authentication tokens presented to a secure section of the web site were not sniffed. The system is not entirely secure, since the actual authentication password can be sniffed from the system, after which the sniffer can apply for a secure authentication token. However, the basic architecture here lays the foundation for a secure system and can be easily adapted to a more secure authentication system by forcing all logins to occur over HTTPS.
The authentication system issues up to four signed cookies (see below), with each cookie serving a different purpose. These cookies are:
reissued on any hit separated by more than SessionRenew seconds from the previous hit that received a cookie
is valid only for SessionTimeout seconds
is the canonical source for the session ID in ad_conn
is used for permanent logins
is used for permanent secure logins
contains random garbage (ns_time) to prevent attack against the secure hash
is a session-level cookie from the browser's standpoint
its signature expires in SessionLifetime seconds
contains random garbage (ns_time) to prevent attack against the secure hash
user_id is extraneous
The Tcl function (
sec_handler) is called by the request
processor to authenticate the user. It first checks the
ad_session_id cookie. If there
is no valid session in progress, a new session is created with
sec_setup_session. If the user
has permanent login cookies (
ad_user_login_secure), then they are looked
at to determine what user the session should be authorized as.
Which cookie is examined is determined by whether or not the
request is on a secure connection. If neither cookie is present,
then a session is created without any authentication. If the
ad_session_id cookie is valid,
the user_id and session_id are pulled from it and put into
Secure connections are authenticated slightly differently. The
used to determine whether or not the URL being accessed is requires
a secure login. The function simply checks if the location begins
with "https". (This is safe because the location is set
during the server initialization.)
If secure authentication is required, the
ad_secure_token cookie is checked to make
sure its data matches the data stored in
ad_session_id. This is true for all pages
except those that are part of the login process. On these pages,
the user can not yet have received the appropriate
ad_secure_token cookie, so no check against
it is performed. The set of pages that skip that processing are
determined by determined by
ad_login_page. Since the
ad_secure_token cookie is a session cookie,
it is deleted by the browser when the browser exits. Since an
attacker could conceivably store the secure cookie in a replay
attack (since expiration date is not validated), the data in the
secure cookie is never used to set any data in ad_conn; user_id and
session_id is set from the ad_session_id cookie.
It is important to note that the integrity of secure
authentication rests on the two Tcl function
ad_secure_conn_p is false, secure
authentication is not required. If
ad_login_page is false, secure
authentication is not required.
The Tcl function
ad_user_login does two things. First it
performs the appropriate manipulation of the permanent login
cookies, and then it updates the current session to reflect the new
user_id. The manipulation of the permanent login cookies is based
on 3 factors:
previous login: other user, same user
permanent: was a permanent login requested?
secure: is this a secure connection?
Both the secure and insecure permanent login cookie can have one of three actions taken on it:
set: cookie with no expiration is set
delete: set to "" with max age of 0, so it is expired immediately
nothing: if the cookie is present, it remains
The current state of the permanent login cookies is not taken into account when determining the appropriate action.
|previous login state||permanent login requested||secure connection||action on insecure||action on secure|
sec_generate_session_id_cookie to generate
the new cookie with refer to the appropriate user_id. If the
connection is secure the
ad_secure_token cookie is generated by a
function is only called from
ad_user_logout logs the user
out by deleting all 4 cookies that are used by the authentication
The creation and setup of sessions is handled in
sec_setup_session, which is called either
to create a new session from
sec_handler or from
ad_user_login when there is a change in
authorization level. The session management code must do two
things: insure that session-level data does not float between
users, and update the users table which has columns for
If there is no session already setup on this hit, a new session
is created. This happens when
sec_setup_session is called from
sec_handler. If the login is
from a user to another user, a new session is created, otherwise,
the current session is continued, simply with a higher
authorization state. This allows for data associated with a session
to be carried over when a user logs in.
The users table is updated by
sec_update_user_session_info which is
called when an existing session is assigned a non-zero user_id, or
when a session is created with a non-zero user_id.
ad_user_login assumes a
password check has already been performed (this will change in the
future). The actual check is done by
ad_check_password. The database stores a
salt and a hash of the password concatenated with the salt.
Updating the password (
ad_change_password) simply requires getting
a new salt (ns_time) concatenating and rehashing. Both the salt and
the hashed password field are updated.
A session is labeled by a session_id sequence. Creating a
session merely requires incrementing the session_id sequence. We do
two things to improve the performance of this process. First,
sequence values are precomputed and cached in the Oracle SGA. In
addition, sequence values are incremented by 100 with each call to
nextval. These sequences values are cached on a per-thread basis.
The cost of allocating a new session thus becomes the cost of
executing an incr Tcl command per thread. This minimizes lock
contention for the session ID sequence and also minimizes the
number of DB requests, since each thread can allocate 100 sessions
before requiring another DB hit. This cache works by keeping two
new value is requested from the db and
tcl_max_value is incremented by 100. This
is done on a per-thread basis so that no locking is required.
In addition, two procedures are dynamically generated at startup
security-init.tcl. These two
obtain the constant value of a given parameter; these values are
used to dynamically generate a procedure that returns a constant.
This approach avoids (relatively) expensive calls to
sec_handler. The impact of this approach is
that these parameters cannot be dynamically changed at runtime and
require a server restart.
Session properties are stored in a single table that maps
session IDs to named session properties and values. This table is
periodically purged. For maximum performance, the table is created
with nologging turned on and new extents are allocated in 50MB
increments to reduce fragmentation. This table is swept
sec_sweep_session which removes sessions
whose first hit was more than SessionLifetime seconds (1 week by
default) ago. Session properties are removed through that same
process with cascading delete.
Session properties can be set as secure. In this case,
fail if the connection is not secure.
ad_get_client_property will behave as if
the property had not been set if the property was not set
Signed cookies are implemented using the generic secure digital signature mechanism. This mechanism guarantees that the user can not tamper with (or construct a value of his choice) without detection. In addition, it provides the optional facility of timing out the signature so it is valid for only a certain period of time. This works by simply including an expiration time as part of the value that is signed.
The signature produced by
ad_sign is the Tcl list of
token_id,expire_time,hash, where hash =
SHA1(value,token_id,expire_time,secret_token). The secret_token is
a forty character randomly generated string that is never sent to
any user agent. The scheme consists of one table:
create table secret_tokens ( token_id integer constraint secret_tokens_token_id_pk primary key, token char(40), token_timestamp sysdate );
ad_verify_signature takes a
value and a signature and verifies that the signature was generated
using that value. It works simply by taking the token_id and
expire_time from the signature, and regenerating the hash using the
supplied value and the secret_token corresponding to the token_id.
This regenerated hash is compared to the hash extracted from the
supplied signature. The expire_time is also verified to be greater
than the current time. An expire_time of 0 is also allowed, as it
indicates no time out on the signature.
Signed cookies include in their RFC2109 VALUE field a Tcl list of the value and the signature. In addition to the expiration of the digital signature, RFC 2109 specifies an optional max age that is returned to the client. For most cookies, this max age matches the expiration date of the cookie's signature. The standard specifies that when the max age is not included, the cookie should be "discarded when the user agent exits." Because we can not trust the client to do this, we must specify a timeout for the signature. The SessionLifetime parameter is used for this purpose, as it represents the maximum possible lifetime of a single session.
RFC 2109 specifies this optional "secure" parameter which mandates that the user-agent use "secure means" to contact the server when transmitting the cookie. If a secure cookie is returned to the client over https, then the cookie will never be transmitted over insecure means.
Performance is a key goal of this implementation of signed
cookies. To maximize performance, we will use the following
architecture. At the lowest level, we will use the
secret_tokens table as the canonical set of
secret tokens. This table is necessary for multiple servers to
maintain the same set of secret tokens. At server startup, a random
subset of these secret tokens will be loaded into an ns_cache
secret_tokens. When a
new signed cookie is requested, a random token_id is returned out
of the entire set of cached token_ids. In addition, a
thread-persistent cache called tcl_secret_tokens is maintained on a
Thus, the L2 ns_cache functions as a server-wide LRU cache that has a minimum of 100 tokens in it. The cache has a dual purpose:
LRU cache Note that cache misses will only occur in the multiple server case, where a user agent may have a signature guaranteed by a secret token issued by another server in the cluster.
signature cache Since the cache always maintains a minimum of 100 (set by a parameter) tokens populated at startup, it can be used to provide a random token for signature purposes.
The per-thread cache functions as an L1 cache that indiscriminately caches all secret tokens. Note that this is not an LRU cache because there is no cache eviction policy per se -- the cache is cleared when the thread is destroyed by AOLserver.
Storing information on a client always presents an additional security risk.
Since we are only validating the information and not trying to protect it as a secret, we don't use salt. Cryptographic salt is useful if you are trying to protect information from being read (e.g., hashing passwords).
External SSL mechanisms (firewall, dedicated hardware, etc.) can be used by creating two pools of AOLservers. In one pool the servers should be configured with the location parameter of nssock module set to "https://yourservername". The servers in the other pool are configured as normal. The external SSL agent should direct SSL queries to the pool of secure servers, and it should direct non-SSL queries to the insecure servers.
The pseudorandom number generator depends primarily on ns_rand, but is also seeded with ns_time and the number of page requests served since the server was started. The PRNG takes the SHA1(seed,ns_rand,ns_time,requests,clicks), and saves the first 40 bits as the seed for the next call to the PRNG in a thread-persistent global variable. The remaining 120 bits are rehashed to produce 160 bits of output.
ad_user_login user_id Logs the user in as user user_id. Optional forever flag determines whether or not permanent cookies are issued.
ad_user_logout Logs the user out.
ad_check_password user_idpassword returns 0 or 1.
ad_change_password user_idnew password
ad_sign value Returns the digital signature of this value. Optional parameters allow for the specification of the secret used, the token_id used and the max_age for the signature. ad_verify_signature valuesignature Returns 1 or 0 indicating whether or not the signature matches the value specified. The secret parameter allows for specification of a different secret token to be used.
ad_set_signed_cookie namedata Sets a signed cookie name with value data.
ad_get_signed_cookie name Gets the signed cookie name. It raises an error if the cookie has been tampered with, or if its expiration time has passed.
Sets a session
property with name to value
data for the module
module. The optional secure
flag specifies the property should only be set if the client is
authorized for secure access (
ad_secure_conn_p is true). There is also an
optional session_id flag to
access data from sessions other than the current one.
Gets a session
property with name to for
the module module. The
optional secure flag specifies the property should only be
retrieved if the client is authorized for secure access
ad_secure_conn_p is true).
There is also an optional session_id flag to access data from
sessions other than the current one.
SessionTimeout the maximum time in seconds (default 1200) between requests that are part of the same session
SessionRenew the time in seconds (default 300) between reissue of the session cookie. The minimum time that can pass after a session cookie is issued and before it is rejected is (SessionTimeout - SessionRenew). This parameter is used so that only one session_id cookie is set on a single page even if there are multiple images that are being downloaded.
SessionLifetime the maximum possible lifetime of a session in seconds (default 604800 = 7 days)
NumberOfCachedSecretTokens the number of secret tokens to cache. (default 100)
The pseudorandom number generator used in the OpenACS is
cryptographically weak, and depends primarily on the randomness of
ns_rand function for its
randomness. The implementation of the PRNG could be substantially
Add a password argument. It is non-optimal to make the default behavior to assume that the password was provided.
The secret tokens pool is currently static. Ideally, this pool should be changed on a random but regular basis, and the number of secret_tokens increased as the number of users come to the web site.
Since the security of the entire system depends on the secret tokens pool, access to the secret tokens table should be restricted and accessible via a strict PL/SQL API. This can be done by revoking standard SQL permissions on the table for the AOLserver user and giving those permissions to a PL/SQL package.
Deferring session to creation until the second hit from a browser seems to be a good way of preventing a lot of overhead processing for robots. If we do this, send cookie on first hit to test if cookies are accepted, then actually allocate on second hit. To preserve a record of the first hit of the session, just include any info about that first hit in the probe cookie sent. Look at how usca_p (user session cookie attempted) is used in OpenACS 3.x ecommerce.
Currently there are only session properties. Because sessions have a maximum life, properties have a maximum life. It would be nice to expand the interface to allow for more persistent properties. In the past, there was a sec_browser_properties table that held permanent properties about each unique visitor (for logged in users, these are just user properties). This was unscalable because there was no way to delete these properties, and the table tended to grow to millions of rows. It would be nice to view browser and session properties as two types of client properties, but with different deletion patterns (there are other differences as well, browser properties can be shared between concurrent sessions). The applications should have control over the deletion patterns, but should not be able to ignore the amount of data stored.
It would be nice to keep some info about sessions: first hit, last hit, and URLs visited come to mind. Both logging and API for accessing this info would be nice. WimpyPoint is an application that already wants to use this information to show how long the current presentation has been viewed. The right way may be to put the session_id into the access log and use log analyzers (leaving it in server memory for applications to access). Putting it into the database at all is probably too big a hammer. Certainly putting it into the database on every hit is too big a hammer.
Two trends drive the requirement for removing cookie dependence. WAP browsers that do not have cookies, and publc perceptions of cookies as an invasion of privacy. The rely on the cookies mechanism in HTTP to distinguish one request from the next, and we trust it to force requests from the same client to carry the same cookie headers. The same thing can be accomplished by personalizing the URLs sent back to each browser. If we can store an identifier in the URL and get it back on the next hit, the sessions system would continue to work.
Problems that arise:
URL sharing could be dangerous. If I happen to be browsing Amazon while logged in and I email a friend, he could conceivably receive it and follow it before my session has expired, gaining all of the privileges I had.
User-entered URLs are harder to handler. If a user is in the middle of a session and then types in the URL of some page, he could be kicked out of his session.
Both of these problems can be mitigated by doing detection of cookie support (see the section on robot detection). To help deal with the first problem, One could also make the restriction that secure sessions are only allowed over cookied HTTP.
This section is not meant to be a comprehensive analysis of the vulnerabilities of the security system. Listed below are possible attack points for the system; these vulnerabilities are currently theoretical in nature. The major cryptographic vulnerability of the system stems from the pseudorandom nature of the random number generators used in the system.
Cryptographically weak PRNG see above.
sampleSQL command The list of random token that are placed in the secret tokens cache is randomly chosen by the Oracle
samplecommand. This command may not be entirely random, so predicting the contents of the secret tokens cache may not be as difficult as someone may anticipate.
ns_randThe actual token that is chosen from the cache to be used is chosen by a call to
ad_secure_conn_pAs discussed above, the security of the secure sessions authentication system is dependent upon this function.