Forum OpenACS Development: Response to user preferences - a new package?

Collapse
Posted by Michael Feldstein on
Forgive the naive question, but shouldn't it be possible to share
commonly used bits of code with all the package builders
without building those bits into the core? Can you create some
kind of (dare I say it?) objects that can be implemented
individually and, if absolutely necessary, ideosynchratically in
various packages without having to cram those features into the
core? Or does this not make sense in the OpenACS world?