I agree completely with Janine. There's something called
"consistency", and it's
valuable. As long as OpenACS
officially claims to support Oracle, then it had damn well better
actually support Oracle. And if that support has caveats or
limitations, then those need to be clearly, correctly, and, uh,
consistently stated.
IMNSHO, if any individual developer chooses not to even do the
easy, 2% extra effort stuff to help maintain support for both
databases, then whether he knows it or not, that developer has taken
it upon himself to sabotage OpenACS's multi-db support, and therefore
to make the OpenACS community look like a bunch of sloppy,
inconsistent dilettantes. And that's a Bad Thing...
