Stephen: I agree with Al, this should cover what is packaged and distributed as dotLRN, not fixes and things that are generic and rolled back into OpenACS. OpenACS governance remains independent.

Here is my proposal for dotLRN governance:

http:// dotlrn.openforce.net/project/governance.adp

You'll notice a number of common points (Al and I went back and forth on these proposals), but a noticeable difference on the overall philosophy of who drives development and how. Please send comments!