Forum .LRN Q&A: Response to Request for Comment: dotLRN Technology Governance

I was thinking that the new portal package had already been imported into OpenACS, but it looks like just the old one is there, my bad.  That's the direction though right? Generally useful stuff developed for .LRN was to be folded back into OpenACS?  It's just that your document, Al asserts specific rights over portal/portlet scripts, datamodels and APIs.

Would .LRN be kept as a seperate download, and any code integrated into OpenACS would not be considered under the control of any .LRN organization?