Forum OpenACS Q&A: Bookmarks - revised for postgresql

Posted by Cathy Sarisky on 08/22/02 01:32 AM

I *believe* I have a working version of bookmarks with postgresql for 4.6. I believe all the following bugs are squashed:

Not able to delete bookmarks
Not able to relocate bookmarks
Bookmarks package only partially subsite aware and unhappy being mounted twice in a subsite.

I don't THINK I broke anything in the Oracle version in the process. (*Fingers crossed.*)

If anyone would be willing to help me take my hacked bookmarks package for a spin, I've got 3 instances mounted at bookmarks.acornhosting.net. Error reports would be appreciated. :)

Note: multiple bookmarks instances don't interact at all, and there is currently no way to move a bookmark or folder from one instance to another. If you create a bookmark or folder in one instance, you won't be able to see it in another.

Note #2: I'm joining on acs-objects more than 4.5 release did to deal with subsites. I don't know yet how bad of a performance hit I've caused in the process.

2: Bookmarks: known remaining bugs (response to 1)

Posted by Cathy Sarisky on 08/22/02 03:49 AM

Thanks to Mark D and Caroline M for pointing these out:

Delete-dead-links is broken. Looks like an unported query.
Mark D suggests a cancel button on the confirmation page for deleting a link. That's easy. :)
The Javascript version isn't showing any bookmarks. Any JS gurus want to take a look? The making a bookmark to add bookmarks works great (and that's frankly the only JS feature *I* will use), but it doesn't display the bookmarks in the JS popup window like it should.
Sorting lists of links by name doesn't seem to work. On my list.
It is currently possible to move a folder into itself and other nonsense. Will fix.

3: Response to Bookmarks - revised for postgresql (response to 1)

Posted by Ola Hansson on 08/22/02 01:59 PM

Hi Cathy,

I have a couple of bugs and/or feature requests to report.

1) You should be able to make a bookmark private when you add it, you should not have to edit it to make it private.

2) I don't think we want to reveal our email addresses to unregistered users. As of now they can view public bookmarks, click "details" and see it.

3) The index page should be templated, IMHO. It's hard to tell if this is fixed or not on your version since there is no visible template

Thanks for making this useful package even more so!

4: Response to Bookmarks - revised for postgresql (response to 1)

Posted by Jonathan Ellis on 08/22/02 07:51 PM

Nice work!

5: Response to Bookmarks - revised for postgresql (response to 1)

Posted by Peter Marklund on 08/23/02 10:43 AM

Cathy, awesome work! Sorry that I wasn't of any help... I'm *really* glad someone picked up the poor Bookmarks package and put it back in a decent shape.

Concerning committing your changes - do you have commit rights now? Do you really need to create patches? Why don't you just commit all this great stuff? I'm pretty sure no one else has created conflicting changes in the meantime.

/Peter

6: Response to Bookmarks - revised for postgresql (response to 1)

Posted by Kjell Wooding on 08/26/02 08:07 PM

Hi Cathy. I noticed this when I dropped your package on top of a (virginal) OpenACS snapshot:

     
 Database operation "0or1row" failed (exception NSDB, "Query was not     
a statement returning rows.")     
    while executing     
"ns_pg_bind 0or1row nsdb0 {     
     
        select bookmark__initialize_in_closed_p (2581, 2581);     
             
      }"

Some digging turned up this:

    
 select bookmark__initialize_in_closed_p (2581, 2581);    
NOTICE:  identifier "bookmark__initialize_in_closed_p" will be    
truncated to "bookmark__initialize_in_closed_"    
ERROR:  Function 'bookmark__initialize_in_closed_(int4, int4)' does    
not exist    
        Unable to identify a function that satisfies the given    
argument types    
        You may need to add explicit typecasts

I haven't dug into it any more than this (no diff yet, sorry ;), but I though you might want to test the virginal, uninitialized case...

7: Response to Bookmarks - revised for postgresql (response to 1)

Posted by edwin ho on 08/28/02 07:43 AM

Kjell,

could I get a copy of your version of the bookmarks module?

thanks
edwin

8: Re: Bookmarks - revised for postgresql (response to 1)

Posted by Peter Marklund on 12/19/02 06:40 PM

Cathy,
do you know if all of your fixes have been committed yet? Are they both on the head and 4.6 branch? I'm tired of my bookmarks being broken, I'd like to upgrade...

Thanks!

/Peter