Forum OpenACS Q&A: Response to PostgreSQL driver

Collapse
Posted by Scott Goodwin on

In response to Jeremy's posting: the things you said are the reasons why I want to get the modules centralized at SF, particularly your comment about making formatting changes. I want to help refactor and make the modules consistent inside and out. It will be easier to accomplish that if there is one place the code is maintained.

I'll work with you and Jeff Davis to get the initial import of nsora in. You two can discuss what order you'll patch the module to make it current.

I'd like to see each commit tagged in the following way:

I import the initial code and then tag the code with 'start'.

Every release is tagged as:

  v1_0
  v1_1

and so on.

Right after a new release, the major/minor numbers are incremented as needed, and "beta" tacked on the end, like this:

  v1_1       (the release)
  v1_2beta1  (the first beta point)
  v1_2beta2  (the second beta point)
  v1_2beta3  (the third beta point)
  v1_2       (the next release)
  v2_0beta1  (...and you get the picture...)
  v2_0beta2
  v2_0

This keeps the tags short and easier to read on the cvs browse web pages. I realize it's rather arbitrary, but I'd like to standardize on this scheme for all modules.