Forum OpenACS Development: Re: What is the general usefulness of the dir_all_users view?

Yeah, I vacuumed it. One thing on openacs.org is that I changed acs__magic_object_id to be with(iscachable). Making the same change on my side gives something that is still pretty horrible:
Nested Loop  (cost=11105.20..14252.40 rows=1 width=1482)
  ->  Index Scan using forums_messages_pk on forums_messages f  (cost=0.00..3.02 rows=1 width=983)
  ->  Materialize  (cost=13829.18..13829.18 rows=33616 width=499)
        ->  Hash Join  (cost=11105.20..13829.18 rows=33616 width=499)
              ->  Merge Join  (cost=0.00..2494.57 rows=33621 width=354)
                    ->  Index Scan using parties_pk on parties pa  (cost=0.00..812.76 rows=33637 width=146)
                    ->  Index Scan using users_pk on users u  (cost=0.00..1093.40 rows=33621 width=208)
              ->  Hash  (cost=11021.16..11021.16 rows=33616 width=145)
                    ->  Hash Join  (cost=2448.11..11021.16 rows=33616 width=145)
                          ->  Hash Join  (cost=1812.82..9713.52 rows=33621 width=129)
                                ->  Hash Join  (cost=1055.56..8642.72 rows=33628 width=99)
                                      ->  Seq Scan on acs_objects o  (cost=0.00..6014.54 rows=230454 width=91)
                                      ->  Hash  (cost=971.49..971.49 rows=33628 width=8)
                                            ->  Seq Scan on group_element_index  (cost=0.00..971.49 rows=33628 width=8)
                                ->  Hash  (cost=673.21..673.21 rows=33621 width=30)
                                      ->  Seq Scan on persons pe  (cost=0.00..673.21 rows=33621 width=30)
                          ->  Hash  (cost=551.23..551.23 rows=33623 width=16)
                                ->  Seq Scan on membership_rels mr  (cost=0.00..551.23 rows=33623 width=16)

I have not committed the acs__magic_object with(iscachable) since I am scared it will break something (oh, and isstrict should be there as well I think). Should I commit it?